For further materials, see the website of the institute for strategy and competitiveness. Better connectivity of csr with key business source allows employers to recognize that it can be a source of. Porter and kramer 2006 identify some weaknesses of csr. Grin the contribution of porter and kramers concept of. An empirical exploration of the role of strategic and responsive corporate social responsibility in the adoption of different green it strategies. The term shared value is found in porter and kramer 2006, strategy and. However, the concept suffers from some serious shortcomings. They drew a distinction between the common activities related to the well. The origins of the term shared value can be found in porter and kramer 2006, strategy and society. Kramer are the mckinsey award winners for creating shared value.
In this article, michael porter and mark kramer propose a fundamentally new way to look at the relationship between business and society that does not treat corporate growth and social welfare as. Porter harvard business school shared value leadership summit boston, ma may 23, 20 creating shared value as. Kennedy school of government in cambridge, massachusetts. Corporate social responsibility from friedman to porter and. Harv bus rev 8912, 6277, 2011 introduced shared value as a new conception of capitalism, claiming it is a powerful driver of economic growth and reconciliation between business and society. Porter and kramer are the cofounders of both fsg social impact advisors and. Also, when a company uses the value chain to chart all the social consequences of its activities, it has, in effect, created an inventory of problems and opportunities.
Pdf corporate social responsibility from friedman to porter. On page 90 there is an insert entitled integrating company practice and context. How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social. The idea has generated strong interest in business and academia.
According to porter and kramer 2006 there is a lack of success with the companys efforts related to csr in improving business results. Pdf we analyze, from the viewpoint of value creation, the evolution of corporate. The moral appealarguing that companies have a duty to be good citizens. Very often academic research tried to follow and cap. In this article, michael porter and mark kramer propose a fundamentally new. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, boston. Porter and kramer 2002, 2006, pearce and doh 2005, husted and. However, its successful implementation could be influenced by a variety of factors including the firms size, diversification, research and development and market conditions mcwilliams and siegel 2001. Sep 10, 2010 michael porter and mark kramer 2006 proposed a new way to look at business that does not treat corporate success and social welfare as a zero sum game p. Comparing their definition of csv with carroll or kelly shows that csv is a more concrete concept than the broad idea of csr.
Hence, as noted by maron 2006, csr is applicable in global contexts and a practicality to be absorbed by all businesses within their available resources. Redefining capitalism and the role of the corporation in society. Corporate social responsibility from friedman to porter. Pdf kramer porter 2011 creating shared value wanting. The link between competitive advantage and corporate. This article was the winner of the 2011 mckinsey award. Pdf kramer porter 2011 creating shared value wanting hu. In this thought provoking article, they describe four prevailing justifications for corporate social responsibility a moral obligation, b sustainability, c license to operate. Michael porter and mark kramer introduce creating shared value into the theoretical debate in 2006 with nestle as a leading light in csv application porter and kramer, 2006. What corporate social responsibility means to project manager. From then on, porter suggester the value chain be used to show how a csr project could impact the companys strategy. Carrefours report on sustainable development is available online in a. Pdf corporate social responsibility from friedman to. Pdf this article critically examines porter and kramers shared value concept to.
Student responses on course evaluation forms for the class have identified the following course benefits. Hbr making a real difference spotlight by michael e. Porter and kramer 2006 argue that the lack of effective coordination and control of these csr programmes tends to diffuse companies impact on society, resulting in unrelated efforts and precluding a full range of social benefits from these companies actions. Google scholar porter me, kramer mr 2006, dec 2006 the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. An empirical exploration of the role of strategic and. Transforming counseling pedagogy with horticulture therapy. Dyllick and hockerts 2002 defined corporate sustainability as meeting the needs of direct and indirect stakeholders of the firm. Corporate social responsibility as competitive advantage. Well in 2006, porter wrote a seminar article with his colleague kramer which mentioned the fact that csr is about creating shared value. The idea of shared value was initially explored in a december 2006 hbr article by michael. Corporate social responsibility and bank efficiency. Porter and kramer 2006 initially explored and linked csr activities to firms value chain in order to gain the best outcome. Pdf revisiting the role of shared value in the businesssociety.
Comparing their definition of csv with carroll or kelly shows that csv is a more concrete concept than the. Mar 01, 2020 in accordance with the stakeholder view of csr freeman, 1984, porter and kramer, 2006, one could explain this fact by arguing that maintaining good relationships with all stakeholders ultimately benefits firms by providing them with a competitive advantage. Any additional printing, copying, or posting is considered a infringement. Creating shared value csv is the business model that will accelerate the achievement of the sustainable development goals sdgs.
Friedman critical view of csr to porter and kramer sharedvalue. Porter and kramer 2006 propose a strategic approach to examining the relationship between companies and the society in which they operate. They categorise firms involvement in society as responsive csr and strategic csr based on the importance of certain social issues to society and to business. Porter and kramer 15, writing on corporate philanthropy, also advocate for strategic giving, i. This article critiques porter and kramer s concept of creating shared value. Porter is the bishop william lawrence university professor at harvard university. Porter and kramer 2006 highlight that the businesss primary concern is to run a. Sep 22, 2017 porter me, kramer mr 2002 the competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. An extension of porter and kramers creating shared value. Kramer estrategia y sociedad diciembre 2006 reimpresion r0612de. The strengths of the idea are highlighted in terms of its popularity among practitioner and academic audiences, its connecting of strategy and social goals, and its systematizing of some previously underdeveloped, disconnected areas of research and practice. Branco and rodrigues 2006 lead csr in connection with the companys commitment to contribute to corporate sustainability.
Designmethodologyapproach traces the rise in interest in corporate social responsibility csr and the range of methodologies available to rank. He is a frequent contributor to hbr, and his most recent article is seven surprises for new ceos october 2004. The corporate shared value for sustainable development mdpi. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Porter and kramer are the cofounders of both fsg social impact advisors and the cen. The idea of shared value was initially explored in a december 2006 hbr article by michael e. Kramer, identified measurement as a key driver of shared value adoption. This is consistent with porter and kramer 2006 view on competitive context. Corporate social responsibility and international competition. December 2006 62 managing the right tension r dominic dodd.
18 360 1432 553 490 710 300 855 327 166 1500 358 1390 1527 286 273 442 740 164 203